Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Review: The Gates of Rutherford by Elizabeth Cooke


The Gates of Rutherford
By Elizabeth Cooke
Published by Berkeley, September 1, 2015
Purchased and Read on Amazon Kindle
Links: Amazon, B&N, Powell's
Rating: Three Stars (out of five)

The Gates of Rutherford is the third in Elizabeth Cooke’s series of novels about the fictional English estate Rutherford Park.  Like Rutherford Park (2013) and The Wild Dark Flowers (2014), it takes us into the world of the aristocratic Cavendish family, their servants, and others with whom they come in contact during the tumultuous years surrounding World War I.

I was very excited for the release of this novel.  I’ve been waiting for it since last summer, when I read the sample in the back of The Wild Dark Flowers (Note to publishers: if you’re going to keep your readers waiting for a year, skip the sample—it’s just mean!)For some reason, though, this book fell flat.  Maybe too much time has passed since I read the last book or maybe my expectations were just too high, but I was disappointed.

I think the problem lies in the (lack of) depth in both plot and characterization; there are many characters and plotlines in this book.  The most compelling story centers on the younger Cavendish daughter Charlotte, who rushes into marriage, regrets it, and discovers important truths about herself.  We also spend considerable time with various characters on the warfront in France and see how the war impacts sweethearts and prisoners on the homefront in England.  In one way or another, the stories all connect via Rutherford, but some of them, such as the German prisoner’s story, aren’t tied in very thoroughly.  Because there are so many characters, we don’t spend much time with any of them, so some of the stories are not well fleshed-out.

How much I enjoy a book usually comes down to how much I care about the characters.  In The Gates of Rutherford, I cared about Charlotte, but I suspect that’s because I got to know her in the earlier books, not because of Cooke’s characterization here.  This was even more true for Charlotte’s brother Harry and family retainer Jack Armitage, both of whom are fighting in the war.  Harry was frequently annoying here and we learned little about Jack except that he cares for horses and for Louisa Cavendish (Charlotte’s sister).  Had Gates been my only encounter with either character, I would have little reason beyond basic human decency to care whether they lived or died.

Ultimately, I liked learning more about what happened to the Cavendishes and their household, and I would certainly read another book in this series, if only to find out how Charlotte’s story progresses and how the family handles a major event at the end of Gates.  For Cooke’s existing fans, this was a good if not stellar entry in the series.  I doubt, however, that it will draw a lot of new readers to the series.

No comments:

Post a Comment