Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Special Feature: Inspector Lewis: The Academic Body Count, Season 2 Part 3

The Oxford University of ITV/PBS's Inspector Lewis is a dangerous world for academics, and in this series I bring you the lowdown on who in the academic community is most likely to kill be or be killed.  This post gives the details for episodes 6-7 of US Season Two.  Previous posts in the series: Intro, Season One, Season 2 Part 1, Season 2 Part 2.

 The final two episodes of Season 2 give us one undergraduate victim, three community victims (one an Oxford alum, though), and two—yes, two—faculty murderers (one for each episode).  So we’re back to the Season One problem, it would seem, insofar as Oxford is in more danger from academics than it is a danger to academics.  If it’s any comfort (and I’m not sure it is!), only in “The Quality of Mercy” do the murders directly relate to university life; in “The Point of Vanishing,” the murderer is just a murderer who happens to have “professor” as his job title.

As this is the last season 2 post, it’s time for some overall season totals.  Over seven episodes, we have fifteen victims (only episode 2.3 breaks the “two victims per episode” norm).  Three of those victims are undergrads, two are faculty, three are administrators, one is staff, and six are unaffiliated with the university.  Of eight murderers, four are faculty members (two in episode 2.1, remember) and four are unaffiliated with the university.  A variety of faculty, staff, and students assist Lewis and Hathaway in their investigations, so the university isn’t all bad for the community, but I have to admit that these episodes make faculty look pretty scary.  It’s even more worrying to this humanist that three quarters of the faculty murderers are in the humanities.  And we like to think our fields of study improve our behavior toward our fellow humans!  The good news, I guess, is that while grad school often feels like a kill-or-be-killed kind of world, not one grad student has done either—yet (though to be fair it’s kind of a grad student’s fault that everything goes so badly wrong in “The Quality of Mercy”).

If you haven't seen the season, here's the Amazon link.  It's included with Prime, if you have it.

Details for Episodes 2.6 and 2.7 below the cut.  Contains spoilers.




Episode 2.6, “The Quality of Mercy”
Original Air Date: October 11, 2009

This episode is all about plagiarism… and Shakespeare.  So, basically, it’s the kind of stuff (former) English professors have nightmares about.  Only the students and faculty at the center of the episode are in the theatre department, not the English department.  That hardly matters, all things considered.  Basically, the student playing Shylock in a production of The Merchant of Venice is murdered during the preview performance.  Lewis and Hathaway discover that college theatre departments are full of sex, drugs, jealousy, and backstabbing (duh).  An alumna of the same college, now a reporter for a national newspaper, comes to see the premier, which goes forward because Shylock has an unofficial understudy.  After the opening night party, she’s murdered too.  Why?  Well, it’s because she’s about to expose that the grad student who is directing the production had her boyfriend write her dissertation, which has been lauded as groundbreaking (confused academic readers, never mind the groundbreaking dissertation, just focus on the murders; they make much more sense).  The first victim—we’ll call him Shylock—also knew about the plagiarism.  But is the plagiarizer the murderer?  Nope!  It’s the plagiarizer’s advisor, who fears that her academic reputation will be ruined if her protégée is exposed as a fraud.  Now that I think about it, I kind of feel like academia’s reputation has been ruined by this episode.

Totals: Two victims, one an undergrad and the other an alumna of the same college.  One murderer whose academic reputation was threatened by the victims.  Lots of students, grad and undergrad, assist in or inhibit the investigation in one way or another (as they assist and inhibit so much in life…).
Conclusions: Don’t plagiarize!  And don’t try cover up plagiarism!  You will be found out!  Just like your freshman comp professor told you…


Episode 2.7, “The Point of Vanishing”
Original Air Date: October 18, 2009

If things look bad for theatre departments in episode 2.6, they look almost as bad for art historians, here.  I mean, there are no plagiarizers and no undergraduate murder victims here, but there is a fairly stupid faculty murderer.  However, the two murders in this episode aren’t connected to university life so much as they’re connected to the murderer’s past and to a weird, long-term love triangle.  In this episode, we meet the family of a prominent atheist whose daughter Jessica was paralyzed when Stephen Mullen, a religious zealot, pulled his truck in front of her car, believing her father was driving.  Shortly before Jessica’s eighteenth birthday, Stephen is released from prison, only to be murdered, or so Lewis and Hathaway think.  They quickly discover that the victim isn’t him, but his roommate, and that Jessica has been secretly seeing Stephen.  The murderer figures it out too, and at Jessica’s party he kills the real Stephen, believing he is protecting Jessica.  So why does an art historian murder the man who injured a girl he’s not even related to?  Well, it turns out that he’s been in love with her mother since college, and said mother has him wrapped around her finger.  And what’s worse, she convinces her husband that their son actually committed the murders, and said husband confesses and commits suicide.  So basically, the murderer kills for love and the woman he loves drives her husband to suicide… because.  I don’t know.  This episode is not one of my favorites.

Totals: Two victims.  Neither has anything to do with the university.  One murderer, whose status as a professor is irrelevant to his crime.
Conclusion: You know those songs that say “Don’t give up on love”?  They’re wrong.  When the woman you love is married to someone else, you should stop letting your infatuation control you.  Seriously. 

No comments:

Post a Comment